维普论文检测系统VIP PAPER CHECK SYSTEM武汉封城76天居民生活状况的媒体呈现一一基于《长江日报》与《澎湃新闻》的比较研究【原文对照报告-大学生版】报告编号：9d08d7dc5c3bbf6e检测时间：2021-04-2710：56：20检测字符数：37733作者姓名：钟焯所属单位：四川音乐学院全文总相似比他引率自引率专业术语检测结论：8.59%其他指标：自写率：91.41%复写率3.78%4.81%0.0%0.0%高频词：报道，新闻，居民，生活，日报典型相似文章：无指标说明：复写率：相似或疑似重复内容占全文的比重他引率：引用他人的部分占全文的比重自引率：引用自己已发表部分占全文的比重自写率：原创内容占全文的比重典型相似性：相似或疑似重复内容占全文总相似比超过30%专业术语：公式定理、法律条文、行业用语等占全文的比重总相似片段期刊：34博硕：90综合：4相似片段：191外文：0自建库：0互联网：63检测范围：中文科技期刊论文全文数据库中文主要报纸全文数据库中国专利特色数据库博士/硕士学位论文全文数据库中国主要会议论文特色数据库港澳台文献资源外文特色文献数据全库维普优先出版论文全文数据库互联网数据资源/互联网文档资源高校自建资源库图书资源古籍文献资源个人自建资源库年鉴资源IPUB原创作品时间范围：1989-01-01至2021-04-27维普论文检测系统VIP PAPER CHECK SYSTEM原文对照颜色标注说明：■自写片段■复写片段（相似或疑似重复）口引用片段（引用）■专业术语（公式定理、法律条文、行业用语等）学号2017300710031密级武汉大学本科毕业论文武汉封城76天居民生活状况的媒体呈现音乐学院一一基于《长江日报》与《澎湃新闻》的比较研究院（系）名称：新闻与传播学院专业名称：新闻学学生姓名：钟焯指导教师：夏琼教授二O二一年四月郑重声明本人呈交的学位论文，是在导师的指导下，独立进行研究工作所取得的成果，所有数据、图片资料真实可靠。尽我所知，除文中已经注明引用的内容外，本学位论文的研究成果不包含他人享有著作权的内容。对本论文所涉及的研究工作做出贡献的其他个人和集体，均已在文中以明确的方式标明。本学位论文的知识产权归属于培养单位。本人签名：日期：摘要2020年1月23日至4月8日，武汉市受新冠肺炎疫情影响，经历了长达76天的“封城”状态。除关闭离汉通道外，政府还先后实行了公交停运、中心城区车辆禁行、住宅小区封闭等管控措施。毋庸置疑，疫情和管控措施影响着包括医疗、消费、出行、心理在内的居民生活各个方面。本研究以武汉本地党报《长江日报》和市场化媒体《澎湃新闻》两家媒体微信公众号为研究对象，试图回答两者对武汉“封城”期间居民生活状况的呈现框架是什么，有何差异，并分析差异产生的原因，进一步提出优化方向。研究采用内容分析和对比分析方法，对两者报道数量、消息来源、报道主题、报道体裁、配图数量等5个方面进行了深入分析和比较。研究发现，两家媒体通过个体情感的显性表达、话语权的选择性赋予以及模糊化传统的真实准则，建构起各自的主导框架，即《长江日报》为主流意识形态主导下的英雄主义和动员稳定框架，《澎湃新闻》则是市场逻辑驱动下的个体抗争和呈现百态的报道框架，两者各自偏好呈现的，有重叠也有互补，甚至有冲突，一定程度上为公众再现了一个较为全面的“封城”期间武汉居民生活的图景。研究认为，媒体属性和受众群体差异是导致两者框架差异的主要方面，并根据公共危机事件中媒体的功能和职责提出框架优化建议：尊重真实原则，警惕越线煽情：强化居民主体地位，平衡利益诉求表达；积极正面为主，讲究报道时机。关键词：武汉封城：居民：生活状况：媒介呈现：长江日报；澎湃新闻2维普论文检测系统VIP PAPER CHECK SYSTEMABSTRACTJanuary 23 to April 8,2020,Wuhan,the city most severely affected by COVID-19,experienced a76-day "city closure".During the period of "lockdown",in addition to closing the exit from Wuhan,the government has also implemented the bus stop,the central city vehicles banned,residentialquarters closed 24 hours management and other control measures.There is no doubt that the epidemicand its control measures affected every aspect of people's lives,including medical treatment,consumption,transportation and psychological well-being.This study takes the relevant reports of WeChat public accounts of Wuhan's party newspaperChangjiang Daily and market-oriented media The Paper as the research object,trying to answer whatare their frames of presenting the living conditions of the residents of Wuhan during the period of"lockdown"and what is the difference between them,and analyzes the reasons for the difference,andfurther puts forward the direction of optimization.The research adopts content analysis and comparative analysis methods,and makes an in-depthanalysis and comparison on the number of reports,sources of news,topics of reports,genres ofreports and the number of pictures.It is found that the two media have constructed their respectiveleading frames through the explicit expression of individual emotions,selective endowment ofdiscourse power and the blurring of traditional real norms.That is to say,the reporting ofChangjiang Daily adopts the frame of heroism and mobilization stability under the dominance ofmainstream ideology.The Paper,on the other hand,is a reporting frame of individual protests andvarious situations driven by market logic.The two have their own preferences,some overlap,somecomplement,and even conflict.To a certain extent,it reappears to the public a relativelycomprehensive picture of Wuhan residents'life during the "lockdown".According to the research,thedifferences between the two frames mainly focus on the attributes of the media and the differencesof the audience groups,and according to the functions and responsibilities of the media in publiccrisis events,the frame optimization suggestions are put forward:respecting the principle oftruth,and being vigilant against crossing the line of sensationalism;Strengthen the principalposition of residents and balance the interest demands;Mainly positive,pay attention to the timingof the report.Key words:Wuhan lockdown;residents;living conditions;media representation:Changjiang Daily;the Paper目录1引言61.1研究背景61.2研究目的及意义71.3文献综述71.3.1新闻框架研究现状71.3.2媒体公共危机传播研究现状81.3.3居民生活状况研究现状101.4研究创新点111.5研究设计111.5.1研究对象111.5.2研究问题121.5.3研究方法121.5.4样本选择131.5.5类目建构131.5.6信度分析162《长江日报》与《澎湃新闻》样本对比分析173