从《民法典》看个人信息保护的法律适用摘要随着数据信息的发展，互联网与人们的生活日益紧密，一方面，平台通过收集用户的浏览信息以进行广告推送等。而另一方面，通过网络踪迹信息又可以从侧面刻画出用户画像。网络踪迹信息因具有人格利益与商业价值双重性质，在对网络踪迹信息定位上存在一定的困难。目前对网络踪迹信息存在个人信息和隐私权两个方向的讨论。美国和欧盟均针对对此问题进行相关立法和实践争议。我国与欧盟针对网络踪迹信息的定义相类似。我国对个人信息普遍以定义和可识别性为认定标准。然而，在司法实践中，法院所作判决持相反的态度，因此，有必要采取解释路径，对网络踪迹信息进行恰当的定位。首先阐述网络踪迹信息的研究背景以及意义，并说明国内外关于网络踪迹信息定位的现状进行解释。通过选取国内典型案例来表明当今司法实践针对网络踪迹信息的认定意见，并提出问题。在认定网络踪迹信息时，法院在实践中主要考虑个人信息路径和隐私权路径。其次，阐述网络踪迹信息的概念以及将网络踪迹信息纳入法律定位需考虑的价值因素，即人格利益与经济利益。并说明了个人信息与隐私权概念以及它们之间的关系。再次，通过对国外立法进行梳理，并选取国外司法实践案例进行分析。总结国外关于网络踪迹信息的定位。最后归纳以上内容，针对网络踪迹信息定位问题的矛盾，从隐私权和个人信息路径进行分析，从解释论等角度建议将网络踪迹信息纳入个人信息进行保护。关键词网络踪迹信息：个人信息；隐私权Viewing the Application of Laws in the Protection ofPersonal Information from the Civil CodeAbstractWith the development of data information,the Internet has become increasinglyclose to people's lives.The platform collects users'browsing information to pushadvertisements and so on.On the other hand,user portraits can be portrayed from theside through network trace information.Because network trace information has thedual nature of personality benefits and commercial value,there are certaindifficulties in locating network trace information.At present,there are discussions onboth personal information and privacy rights for network trace information.Both the United States and the European Union have controversial legislation andpractice on this issue.my country and the European Union have similar definitionsfor network trace information.In my country,the definition and identifiability ofpersonal information are generally regarded as the standard.However,in judicialpractice,the court's judgments hold the opposite attitude.Therefore,it is necessary toadopt an interpretation path to properly locate the network trace information.First,explain the research background and significance of network traceinformation,and explain the current situation of network trace informationpositioning at home and abroad.By selecting typical domestic cases,it shows theopinions of current judicial practice on the identification of network traceinformation,and raises questions.When determining network trace information,thecourt mainly considers the path of personal information and the path of privacy inpractice.Secondly,it elaborates on the concept of network trace information and thevalue factors that need to be considered when incorporating network traceinformation into legal positioning,namely,personality interests and economicinterests.It also explains the concept of personal information and privacy and therelationship between them.Thirdly,through sorting out foreign legislation,andselecting foreign judicial practice cases for analysis.Summarize the positioning ofinformation on network traces abroad.Finally,the above content is summarized,inview of the contradiction in the location of network trace information,the analysis iscarried out from the perspective of privacy and personal information,and it isrecommended to include network trace information in personal information forprotection from the perspective of interpretation theory.Keywords Network trace information;personal information;privacy