论医疗事故罪与非法行医罪的界限以梁娟医疗事故案为例-摘要：我国刑法第335条和第336条第一款，分别对医疗事故罪和非法行医罪进行了规定。而在司法实践中，可以发现对于此二罪名的运用还存在诸多问题，二罪之间的区别的并非十分明显。故本文将以梁娟医疗事故案为切入点，探讨非法行医罪与医疗事故罪的构成要件，在此基础上，总结出两罪的界限，并尝试提出针对此二罪的建议。除引言与结论，本文共分三个部分。第一部分为案件简介和争议焦点，通过对梁娟案案情的简述，并结合控辩审三方的意见，归纳出本案的争议焦点，即梁娟的行为应构成非法行医罪还是医疗事故罪。第二部分为案件评析，以医疗事故罪与非法行医罪的构成要件为基础，结合本案的案情，认为梁娟的行为应构成医疗事故罪而非非法行医罪。第三部分为思考建议，通过前文对医疗事故罪与非法行医罪的理论分析，结合梁娟案案情，总结出两罪的界限，并提出明确分别两罪主体范围、针对非法行医罪增强有关部门监管力度、针对医疗事故罪增加判例指导的完善建议。关键词：医疗事故罪：非法行医罪：构成要件：主体：主观ON THE BOUNDARY BETWEENTHE CRIME OF MEDICAL ACCIDENTANDTHE CRIME OF ILLEGAL MEDICALPRACTICEAbstract:The crime of medical accident and the crime of illegal practice of medicine are stipulated respectively in Article 335 and Paragraph 1 of Article 336 of Criminal Law of China.However,in judicial practice,we can find that there are still many problems in the application ofthe two crimes,and the difference between the two crimes is not very obvious.Therefore,this paper will take Liang Juan's medical malpractice case as the entry point to discuss the constituent elements of the crime of illegal medical practice and the crime of medical malpractice.On this basis,it summarizes the boundary of the two crimes,and tries to put forward suggestions for judicial perfection.In addition to the introduction and conclusion,this paper is divided into three parts.The first part is the brief introduction of the case and the focus of controversy.Through the brief introduction of the case of Liang Juan,and combining the opinions of the three parties,the dispute focus of the case is summarized,that is,should Liang Juan's behavior constitute the crime ofillegal medical practice or the crime of medical malpractice.The second part is the analysisof the case.Based on the constitution elements of the crime of medical malpractice and the crime of illegal medical practice,combining the facts of this case,it is concluded that Liang Juan's behavior should constitute the crime of medical malpractice rather than the crime of illegalmedical practice.The third part is thinking and suggestions.Based on the theoretical analysisof the crime of medical malpractice and the crime of illegal medical practice in the previous part,combined with the circumstances of Liang Juan's case,the boundary of the two crimes issummarized,and the improvement suggestions are put forward to clarify the main scope of the two crimes respectively,strengthen the supervision of relevant departments for the crime ofillegal medical practice,and increase the guidance of precedents for the crime of medical malpractice.Key words:crime of medical accident;illegal practice of medicine;constitutive requirement;subject;subjectivity